01
A trade finance facility
A revolving limit against which individual shipments are funded. The funder pays the supplier and is repaid when the stock converts, with each transaction drawn and cleared separately.
An importer pays before shipping and gets paid long after arrival. Trade finance funds that window, which is commonly the longest and least visible cash gap an importing business carries.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$5,973/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
6 months at 12.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
The cycle
The gap opens at order, when a deposit is paid against goods that do not exist yet. It widens at shipping, when the balance falls due against goods that are now on a vessel. It widens again at arrival, because duty, freight and clearance are payable before the stock can be sold at all.
Only then does the business have something to sell, and selling it on credit terms opens a further gap of thirty to sixty days. From the first deposit to the customer payment, four to six months is ordinary and longer is common on seasonal ranges.
Trade finance covers the first part of that, from supplier payment to sale. It is the piece that no domestic facility naturally reaches, because there is no invoice to fund and no asset in the business yet, only a payment made against a promise.
Order
Deposit paid
Shipping
Balance paid
Arrival
Duty, GST, freight
Sale
Invoice issued
A worked cycle
Illustrative on stated assumptions. The point is where the cash sits and for how long, rather than any particular set of figures.
| Stage | Day | Cash out | Cash in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deposit at order, 30% | 0 | $45,000 | |
| Balance at shipping | 30 | $105,000 | |
| Freight and insurance | 35 | $9,000 | |
| Duty and clearance | 70 | $7,500 | |
| GST at the border | 70 | Paid and recovered later | |
| Stock available to sell | 75 | ||
| Sold and invoiced | 90 to 120 | $240,000 invoiced | |
| Customer pays | 130 to 160 | $240,000 received |
Illustrative cycle on stated assumptions. GST treatment at the border is a matter for the accountant.
Reading the cycle
A facility sized against the $150,000 supplier invoice covers the supplier and nothing else. Freight, insurance, duty and clearance add roughly $16,500 in the example above, and they fall due at the point the business has already spent everything and has not yet sold anything.
That is the most common sizing error in import funding, and it is entirely avoidable. Landed cost rather than invoice value is the figure the facility should be built around, and calculating it takes a customs broker fifteen minutes on a quote the business already has.
GST at the border is a separate matter again. It is payable on import and recovered through the return, subject to the accountantโs confirmation of timing and treatment, which means it is a genuine cash outflow that comes back later rather than a cost. Businesses that treat it as a cost overstate their funding need, and businesses that forget it entirely find it missing at the worst moment.
The instruments
These are frequently combined rather than chosen between, and a funder will ordinarily assemble a package rather than sell one of them.
01
A revolving limit against which individual shipments are funded. The funder pays the supplier and is repaid when the stock converts, with each transaction drawn and cleared separately.
02
A bank undertaking to pay the supplier once documents matching the terms are presented. It protects both parties on a first transaction, adds cost and paperwork, and matters most where the relationship is new.
03
Terms negotiated directly with the supplier, which ordinarily costs nothing at all and is commonly underused. A supplier confident of repeat orders will frequently move from payment at shipping to thirty days.
04
Once the stock is sold and invoiced, the invoice becomes fundable. Joining the two facilities covers the whole cycle rather than half of it.
The negotiation worth having first
Moving a supplier from payment at shipping to thirty days after shipping removes a month from the funded period at no cost whatever. It is the first thing worth trying and it is skipped surprisingly often, because asking feels like admitting to a cash problem. In practice a supplier that wants repeat orders has its own reasons to help, and the request is ordinary in international trade rather than exceptional.
The boundary
These two cover consecutive halves of the same cycle and are frequently confused, which leads to businesses funding one half twice and the other not at all.
| Feature | Trade finance | Receivables facility |
|---|---|---|
| Funds | The supplier payment | The customer invoice |
| Period covered | Order to sale | Invoice to payment |
| What stands behind it | The goods and the business | The receivable |
| Repaid by | The sale, or the receivables facility | The customer |
| Available before a sale exists | Yes | No |
| Suits | Importers and distributors | Anyone invoicing on credit terms |
An importer selling on credit terms genuinely needs both. Funding only the second half leaves the supplier payment uncovered, which is the part with no domestic alternative.
The trade
When it goes wrong
A vessel delay, a port disruption or a customs hold extends the funded period while the facility continues to charge. The stock is neither in the business nor sold.
What happens:Additional funding cost and a season potentially missed, from an event outside anyoneโs control.
Where the supplier invoices in a foreign currency, the cost in New Zealand dollars is not fixed until it is paid or hedged. A move against the business between order and payment reduces the margin directly.
What happens:A landed cost different from the one the pricing was built on, discovered after the goods are committed.
The facility was repaid from the sale, and the sale has not happened. Stock on a shelf is worth less to a funder than an invoice, and considerably less than the business thinks.
What happens:A facility that has to be repaid from somewhere else, which is the risk that makes buying decisions the real credit decisions here.
The third is the one to hold in mind. Trade finance funds a purchase decision, and the quality of that decision determines whether the facility is repaid. No funding structure improves a range that will not sell.
The process
Generalised rather than specific to any funder. This is the most document-heavy facility on the site alongside debtor finance.
01
What is imported, from whom, how often, and what the sell-through has looked like. A funder is assessing the buying decision as much as the business, because that is what repays the facility.
Documents commonly required
02
Financial statements, management accounts, bank statements and existing facilities. Stock and receivables positions matter more here than in most applications.
Documents commonly required
03
The limit, how individual shipments are drawn, what security is taken over the goods and the business, and whether a receivables facility is joined to it.
Documents commonly required
04
A purchase order is presented, the funder pays the supplier, and the transaction runs through to repayment. The first one is slower than the ones after it, because the process is being established rather than repeated.
Documents commonly required
The honest limit
Funding shortens nothing. The container takes as long as it takes, the customer pays when they pay, and a facility changes who carries the cost of that wait rather than the length of it. A business whose cycle is six months is running a six-month cycle whether or not it is funded.
The changes that actually shorten the cycle are operational. Supplier terms, order frequency, freight consolidation, how quickly stock is cleared and listed, and how promptly invoices go out after delivery all move the number, and several of them cost nothing. A business that shortens its cycle by three weeks needs less facility every cycle thereafter.
Funding and shortening are complementary rather than alternatives, and the ordinary mistake is to reach for the first without examining the second. The cash conversion cycle is the measurement that makes both visible, which is why it has a calculator on this site.
The cost of the window
A trade facility is drawn per shipment and repaid on conversion, so this approximates the cost of carrying one cycle. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$5,973/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
6 months at 12.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
The published source for duty and clearance obligations referred to in the cycle above.
Backs the description of GST payable at the border and recovered through the return.
Relevant where imported goods carry biosecurity requirements that affect clearance timing.
Context for the trade practices described, including supplier terms and documentation.
The published source for the currency movement risk described in this guide.
FAQ
A facility that funds the period between paying an overseas supplier and being paid for the goods. The funder ordinarily pays the supplier directly and is repaid when the stock converts to cash.
For a New Zealand importer, commonly ninety to a hundred and eighty days from deposit to customer payment. Seasonal ranges ordered well ahead can run considerably longer.
Only if the facility is sized to include them. A facility built on the supplier invoice alone leaves the landed costs unfunded, and those fall due before the stock can be sold. Landed cost rather than invoice value is the right sizing basis.
GST is payable on import and recovered through the return, subject to the accountantโs confirmation of timing and treatment. It is a cash outflow that comes back rather than a cost, and both halves of that matter to a funding plan.
No. A letter of credit is a bank undertaking to pay the supplier against conforming documents. It provides security to both parties rather than funding to the buyer, and it is frequently used alongside a facility rather than instead of one.
Ordinarily the supplier directly, rather than the business. That is part of how the funder controls what it is lending against, and it also means the arrangement is visible to the supplier.
Ordinarily a general security agreement over the business, and frequently security over the goods themselves. Where an existing lender holds a general security, the positions have to be resolved before a facility can start.
The funded period extends and the facility keeps charging. Delay is the most common source of unplanned cost in import funding, and building some tolerance into the sizing is more useful than assuming a clean run.
Where the supplier invoices in a foreign currency, the New Zealand dollar cost is not fixed until payment or until it is hedged. A move against the business between order and payment reduces the margin on goods already committed.
No, it precedes one. Trade finance covers order to sale and a receivables facility covers invoice to payment. An importer selling on credit terms genuinely needs both, and joining them covers the whole cycle.
Supplier terms. Moving from payment at shipping to thirty days after removes a month from the funded period at no cost, and it is the first thing worth trying before any facility is arranged.
No. It describes how a product works in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and whether a facility suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.
Related
Supply chain finance
The same relationship viewed from the buyerโs side.
Read onInvoice finance
The facility that funds the second half of the cycle.
Read onTrade finance for NZ importers
The cycle, the costs and the documents in full.
Read onBuying stock
The decision that opens the gap.
Read onAll eight products
Every facility compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A working capital facility is a commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the fees recur for as long as it is used. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Workingcapital.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.